|
Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology |
Questions and problems?Force field questionsI'd like to know which peptide bond conformation was considered (cis or trans, on the N-terminal side) when proline residue parameters were being developed.For Weiner et al. (1984,1986) we just did a qm on the trans for the charges and assumed that the other parameters would lead to a reasonable cis/trans energy difference. For Cornell et al. (1995), we did a 4 amino acid fit for proline which included 2 conformations each for both trans and cis and cis isomers. Then within each of those sets there were two different ring puckers. This is described on page 1361 of the JCC article (Cieplak, Cornell, Bayly, and Kollman, vol 16, pp 1357-1377 (1995)). My h-bonding energies are zero. I know that h-bonding is present... I got h-bonding using 4.0 - what is happening? The new force field does not use hydrogen bonding terms. Web Masters <webadmin@www.amber.ucsf.edu> Last modified: Wed Apr 10 16:34:56 PDT 1996 |
|
Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, 102 Hurtig Hall, 360
Huntington Ave., Boston, MA 02115 Send mail to
e.chudin@neu.edu with
questions or comments about this web site.
|