Colligative
("collective" or "linked together") properties of a
solution refer to the following changes that occur when solute is added to a
pure solvent:
·
Vapor
pressure lowering
·
Boiling
point elevation
·
Freezing
point depression
·
Osmotic
pressure elevation
The
simplest systems that exhibit colligative properties consist of:
(1)
a
pure solvent phase, which may be vapor, lquid, or solid
(2)
a
solution phase
(3)
an
interface between the two phases that is not crossed by the solute

So,
if pure solvent phase is vapor phase, increased flow of solvent into solution
lowers the vapor pressure. Higher T
is then needed to restore the vapor pressure, resulting in increased boiling
point.
Increased
flow of solvent from solid phase into solution results in melting of the solid.
Lower T is required to re-freeze the
solid, i.e., the freezing point is lowered.
If
the pure solvent phase is liquid (as in osmotic pressure experiments) one
actually observes flow of the solvent into the solution phase.
Let's
examine the expression for the chemical potential of solvent in an ideal
solution:
![]()
Since
x £ 1, ln x < 0, and the chemical
potential of solvent in a solution is always lower than that of the pure
solvent.
Now
let's revisit the m vs. T plot that was used to explain phase diagrams. It is important to
recall:
·
Substance
i flows towards phase with lowest mi
·
If
phases a and b are in equilibrium, then ![]()

In
all cases of the colligative properties, the solute acts by lowering the m of the solvent in solution, thus causing
solvent to flow into the solution phase.
The
lower m curve of the solvent shifts
the melting and boiling points as shown above.
Start
with equilibrium condition (pure solid solvent in equilibrium with solvent in
solution)

In
the last step, we recognize that mi for a pure substance is just Gm
for that substance, and the difference between m in the liquid and solid
states is just the free energy of fusion.
We can transform the above equation by taking
¶/¶T
and applying the Gibbs-Helmholtz equation
![]()
as
follows:

If
we integrate this starting from the reference point of pure solvent (x1 = 1, Tf = Tf*),
we obtain

This
is sometimes called the ideal solubility
equation.
Digression: Does the ideal solubility
equation look familiar? Compare it to the other equilibrium expressions we have
encountered:
(Clausius-Clapeyron
equation for sublimation or vaporization)
(van't'Hoff
equation for chemical reaction equilibrium)
All of these are derived from the Gibbs-Helmholtz
equation, which expresses the relationship between G and H and accounts for
the two separate influences of DH
and TDS on
chemical equilibrium.
The
freezing point effect is typically expressed in terms of the solute mole fraction x2 = 1- x1:

A
graph of Tf vs. x2 appears as follows:

The
standard freezing point depression expression we learned in freshman chemistry
was a linear relationship between Tf and x2. This relationship represents the behavior of the
ideal solubility equation in the limit x2
® 0. We therefore make some simplifying
approximations in this limit:
1)
[first term of Taylor
series for ln (1-x2) ]
2)
since n2 << n1. Substituting
and
into this expression
gives x2 » m2M1
.
3)
Since the difference between Tf*
and Tf is small for small
values of x2, then Tf Tf* » (Tf*)

Substituting
these approximations into the above expression and solving for DTf gives

The
expression in parentheses is a constant that depends upon solvent properties only. It is called the freezing point depression constant for the solvent, Kf.

If the solution is
separated from the pure solvent phase by a membrane that is permeable to the
solvent but not the solute, solvent will still tend to flow into the solution.
The result in this case is the development of osmotic pressure P in the solution, which builds until the
chemical potential of the solvent is the same for both the solution and the
pure liquid solvent.
The
equilibrium condition is then

Integrating
the first derivative relation

Thus,
equating the two results,
![]()
where
the second step applies the approximation of taking the first term of the
Taylor series expansion for the function ln(1-x2) as was done for the
freezing point depression derivation, in the limit of small x2.
Also in this limit,

With
these substitution, we have the result
![]()
which
is very similar to the ideal gas equation of state. Since c2
= n2/V, we may also write
![]()
![]()
where
i is the van’t’Hoff factor that represents the number of moles
of particles produced in the solution by each mole of solute. Thus, if NaCl
dissociates completely in water, it would have i=2 (actually i is
a little less than 2, indicating that there is some slight association between
Na+ and Cl- ions in solution, to the
point where Na+Cl- pairs behave as a single
particle.
If the approximations used to derive the simple equation above are not valid (typically as one goes away from the limit of extreme dilution) the equation must be modified. The modification used is exactly analogous to the Virial Equation used to describe deviation from ideal gas behavior.
In practice, osmotic pressure determinations are made by studying P as a function of added mass of solute. Thus, we write the osmotic pressure in terms of r2, the mass of solute per unit volume (substituting r2/M2 for c2):

The most accurate method is to plot P/r vs. r:
![]()
and extrapolate the curve to r2=0. The extrapolated intercept then gives the molecular mass, M2.